That upstream refuses to (CaBLE, for example). We have working screencasting on Wayland, which upstreamĭoesn't have right now by default. We ship VA-API integration, which Google doesn't Upstream Chrom(e|ium) is not readyįor that yet. Thinks it's okay to do less than a good job on shipping software".īeyond addressing the integration issues (both for users and lawyers) withįedora, he said, the Fedora build brings a number of advantages:įor example, Fedora's Chromium will attempt to use Wayland byĭefault on a Wayland desktop. Timely updates is better than a fully conforming package that doesįrom Neal Gompa, who expressed his disappointment with anybody " who " In the case of something like Chromium, a sloppy package that gets That Fedora should perhaps loosen its standards for the Chromium package: " stop using it NOW", and Fedora should consider using the Shipped a Chromium release, noting that a number of them are said to beĪctively exploited on the net. He includedĪ long list of CVE numbers that have been addressed since Fedora last To the Fedora development list to complain about this lag. 48 but, as of this writing, Fedora is shipping version But source updates and updated packages in distribution One of the other advantages claimed for Chromium over Chrome is its faster The task of packaging Chromium has gotten easier for distributors since, but Chromium wasįinally able to enter the Fedora repository in 2013 and has been there ever Including Chromium in Fedora seemed like an impossible task. It all comes down to a difficult impedance-matching task for anybody who GCC, despite the fact that the Chromium developers use LLVM.
Own requirements on software that can be shipped, meaning that some of theĬode (codecs, primarily) that is part of Chromium must be excluded from theīecause that all isn't challenging enough, Fedora builds the browser with To integrate with the rest of the Fedora environment - working well with Libraries are not acceptable packages are expected to use the shared Make changes to meet its own requirements, the problem gets harder yet.įedora does have its own requirements. The result is thatĮven an out-of-the-box build can be challenging if the distributor has to While others must be provided by the operating system. The list ofĭependencies is long some of those are bundled with the browser source, The source tarball (compressed) weighs in at well over 1GB. The problem with Chromium is that it is a huge and messy program to build. Distributors can also add their own features as well. Chromium lacks many of the data-reporting mechanisms found inĬhrome and is rather less insistent about using one's Google ID with random
But Chromium users canĪlso point to what is gained, starting with the fact that it is free It doesn't have Google's automatic updates, for example,Īnd it is missing a number of codecs for problematic media formats.Ĭhromium's ability to use the Google bookmark-synchronization feature was Has brought new attention to this problem.Ĭomparisons between Chrome and Chromium often focus on what the latterīrowser lacks. Struggled to keep up with it a recent discussion in the Fedora community Chrome, of course, isīuilt on an open-source project called Chromium but is notĪn open-source product itself it includes a number of proprietary add-ons.īut the Chromium source is out there and can, with some effort, be used toīuild a working, open-source browser a number of distributors do so.īut Chromium is famously hard to package, and distributors have, at times, That does not mean that everybody wants to run it. Pref(" dominates the Internet at this point, but Pref("gfx.font_rendering.opentype_svg.enabled", false) i tested lastly opera and was amazed too with the work they did on chromium unfortunately its closed source :( and they are forcing search engine settings :( on the other hand the service is soo good that we sometime through away privacy lol for example seriously is there some one that are avoiding google-search at 100% its almost impossible the service is way too goodĪlso talking about kings. Now about chrome i think this is just a giant when you have the money and resources you can do amazing things but may be google will start loosing it a little bit because of the privacy policy i am really glad that UC exist. I am posting here just to share some feelings about firefox 62, i am testing it since a little time, and i have to admit i am impressed with the optimization and how fast this version react (i think it's the fastest one i have tested) as fast as i almost forget about xul/xpi lol. most of the ideas that where developed in chrome came from firefox i personally use both. Since a longtime chrome have been somehow more reliable and faster than firefox. This is just some thoughts about those two kings.